Influencer Sues Rival Influencer for Copying Her "Vibe"

Influencer Sydney Nicole Gifford has sued rival influencer Alyssa Sheil for copyright and trade dress infringement. Gifford claims that after a joint photoshoot, Sheil blocked her on social media and began copying her "vibe." At first, the claim sounds silly, but we are not so sure it is.

Social media influencer Sydney Nicole Gifford has sued rival influencer Alyssa Sheil for copyright and trade dress infringement in Western Texas Federal District Court, where they both live.

Gifford claims that after a joint photoshoot, Sheil blocked her on social media and began copying her "vibe” and “neutral, beige, and cream aesthetic.” At first, the claim sounds silly, but 70 pages of exhibits attached to the complaint show just how much of Gifford’s content Sheil copied. Shiel’s attorney says that Shiel did not copy her, as social media has a “sea of influencers” with the same look.

We will see if Gifford’s claims are viable.

As for copyright, some of Sheil's posts had previously been removed by the platforms for copyright violations. The trade dress element will be interesting to watch unfold. Trade dress traditionally protects the look and feel of a product or product packaging (which, in legal jargon, kind of does mean "vibe"), but has been extended to things like the interior of a restaurant. To qualify as trade dress, the “look and feel” has to be distinctive enough to serve as a source identifier. In other words, it has to essentially be a brand itself. In this highly subjective analysis, it might not be too far of a stretch for a court to find that the look and feel of a social media influencer’s content does qualify as trade dress.

We included a gallery of a handful of the photos below. All of Shiel’s content was posted after Gifford's. When you look at Gifford’s content, without any other identifying information, can you tell that it’s from her page? When you look at Shiel’s content, does it look like it could be Gifford’s, or do you think it could be from any number of other influencers leaning into the “neutral aesthetic”.

Read More
Trade Dress, Trademarks Sarah Stemer Trade Dress, Trademarks Sarah Stemer

[WATCH]: Sarah Stemer's Trademark Tips For Startups and New Companies

From company name to portfolio of registered trademarks here we go! Trademark Attorney, Sarah Stemer, shares trademark tips for startups and new companies. Entering the world of trademarks and brand protection can seem daunting, so Stemer Law created this video to demystify the process. Part of Stemer Law’s TM101 series, this video includes topics like trade dress, international trademarks, trademark searches and common trademark pitfalls.

From company name to portfolio of registered trademarks here we go!

Going from naming your new company or startup, to having a portfolio of registered trademarks can seem daunting. It’s important though, so we made this video to make the process a little more approachable for you. Trademark Attorney, Sarah Stemer, discusses trademark tips for startups and new companies when they are in the process of developing or protecting their brand, with a brief discussion about trade dress, international trademarks, trademark searches and common pitfalls. Part of Stemer Law’s TM101 series.

Read More
Trademarks, TTAB, Trade Dress Sarah Stemer Trademarks, TTAB, Trade Dress Sarah Stemer

A "Shoe"-In This Time, or Will They Get The Boot Again? Timberland Asks Appeals Court for Trademark Protection Over Their Iconic Footwear

Timberland is asking the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals for trademark protection over their iconic boot, not just the name or logo of the company, but the boot itself! Here is a brief summary. Full article coming soon.

Timberland is asking the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals for trademark protection over their iconic boot (not just the name or logo of the company, but the boot itself!)

The shoe company first filed their unsuccessful trademark application to the United States Patent and Trademark Office nearly 9 years ago and have been appealing their way up the ladder since. Now, they will have to convince the Court that their boot is distinctive enough to serve as a brand, and that the design of the boot has no function.

Product configuration trademark protection is extremely hard to come by, but they are not unheard of, for shoes in particular.

More on this soon.

Read More